home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
EuroCD 3
/
EuroCD 3.iso
/
Programming
/
Amos
/
AMOSList-0497
/
AMOSLIST
/
000067_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Thu Apr 10 22:06:26 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1998-06-24
|
2KB
|
46 lines
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [204.91.197.224])
by mail2.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA19651
for <mcox@access.digex.net>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 22:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA11145
for amos-out; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail3.access.digex.net (mail3.access.digex.net [205.197.247.4])
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA11138
for <amos-list@svcs1.digex.net>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from onyx-206.southwind.net (brinkman@onyx-204.southwind.net [204.95.83.2])
by mail3.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15898
for <amos-list@access.digex.net>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:57:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (brinkman@localhost) by onyx-206.southwind.net (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id SAA08530; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 18:57:31 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 18:57:31 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Brinkman <brinkman@southwind.net>
To: Paul Hickman <paul.hickman@mycom-media.com>
cc: "'AMOS List'" <amos-list@access.digex.net>
Subject: RE: The AMOS Deception
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=Eyretel_Limited%l=MAILGATE-970410103330Z-18074@mailgate.eyretel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970410185638.3143E-100000@onyx-206.southwind.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Paul Hickman wrote:
> >
> >> There is NO need to include an AMOS_System drawer, at least as
> >> far as I know. I have NEVER included it on a distribution-disk.
> >
> >That is like asking for a beating :) I would rather NOT RELEASE any software,
> >than admit `look I made this in AMOS'.
>
> Technically, it is illegal to distribute an compiled AMOS Program unless
> you include the 'this program was written with AMOS' logo screen that
> comes with the compiler.... Not that I've ever heard of Europress suing
> anyone.
>
I thought that the removed that stipulation when publishers were rejecting
products that WERE programmed with AMOS...